Last night, Pavel Bure was one of four players inducted into the Hockey Hall of Fame.
He’s in the Hallowed Hall, the biggest honor a player can earn, yet his jersey #10 remains absent from the rafters of Rogers Arena.
When team owner, Francesco Aqulini, reportedly flew to meet with Bure personally, it sparked rumors that the Canucks were planning on retiring his jersey. The team has neither confirmed or denied the story, leaving more room for speculation.
The question of whether to retire his number or not is a topic that remains, to say the least, controversial. If he had stayed in Vancouver and not asked for a trade, few people would object to hanging his number from the rafters. The way he left Vancouver is the biggest reason people argue against retiring his #10. I, personally, think his jersey should be retired, and not just put in the Ring of Honour, for a number of reasons:
1) He was the team’s first bonafide superstar. He put up numbers that had never been seen by this organization and may never see again. He scored 154 goals in his first three seasons; he was the first, and still the only, Canuck player to score 60 goals in a season, which he did twice. Not only that, but he did it mostly without elite-level linemates. As good as Trevor Linden, Cliff Ronning and Greg Adams were, they were never top-level scorers on par with the rest of the league’s leading-scorers. The only time Bure had a teammate that was equal to his own talent level was when he was reunited with Alexander Mogilny, a former 70-goal scorer in the NHL and Bure’s old linemate in Russia.
That was the part of Bure’s career when major injuries started taking him out of action for long periods of time. The two didn’t get to play together very much and when they did, the chemistry that we’d all hoped to see never materialized to a great extent. It was an experiment that didn’t really succeed at the time, but if Mogilny had come in earlier in Bure’s career, they might’ve lit the league on fire.
2) One of the reasons for him leaving was due to the fact that he felt mistreated by management. There were rumors going around that he had threatened to hold out for a new contract during the 1994 playoffs. Bure denied the allegation and felt the team didn’t seem to come to his defense. There were numerous contract disputes over the next few seasons so he asked for a trade. It might seem like an over-reaction but I seem to recall another NHL star player getting his feathers ruffled, and he came out of it relatively unscathed.
That player was Patrick Roy. In 1995, Roy gave up 9 goals in a game, taunted fans in his own building, and pulled a Slap Shotesque “trade me right effing now!” stunt in front of a live audience. He left Montreal in a major huff, and yet his #33 hangs from the revered rafters in Habland. The way he departed from Montreal was probably worse than the way Bure left Vancouver, and yet Roy has been immortalized by his original team while Bure has not.
If Patrick Roy can have his number retired by the Canadiens after the way he left that organization, Bure can have his number retired by the Canucks.
3) The drama happened a long time ago. Time, as they say, heals all wounds. The Habs forgave Roy, we should be able to forgive Bure 15 years after he got the trade that he requested.
4) He’s in the hall of freaking fame. If he’s good enough to get inducted there, he should be good enough to have his number retired in the city where he established himself as a star.
While some will say that a player’s connection to his community should be a determining factor in having his number retired, I don’t think it should overshadow his monumental achievements on the ice. He’s a private person, he came from a different background, he shouldn’t be denied an honor because of his reluctance to be involved outside of the rink.
Whether you agree or disagree, I feel that what he did on the ice should be enough to raise #10 to the rafters at Rogers Arena.
With its 3rd lockout in 18 years, averaging 1 lockout every 6 years, is this league the worst in its regard for fans? Is there any other league that seems to be so ready to sacrifice games in order to get a new labor agreement?
Personally, I’m a huge fan of hockey. This league? Not so much. The business side of the game has completely taken over what could be a great, if not just a competent, league. If it continues like this, I may stop supporting this league altogether.
I don’t follow any other major sport but I seem to recall the NFL avoiding a lockout and getting a deal done just before this season started. I may be wrong but I remember something like that happening and hoping that the NHL would follow suit. If not to completely avoid a lockout altogether, then to at least get a deal done quickly. That should be their first priority but there’s no indication that it’s even a blip on their radar screen.
I’ve also been disappointed in the frequency of meetings between the 2 sides, so far I’ve heard of them meeting 2 or 3 times since the lockout was announced almost a month ago. As a fan, I think they should be meeting every day if possible. The more meetings, the quicker they can hammer out a deal. At least that’s what would ideally happen, there’s no way of telling if this ordeal would be resolved with more meetings happening more frequently because it’s not happening now and probably never will occur.
Every day they don’t meet, they lose more money. You’d think that would be more motivation but apparently they couldn’t care less. This is the only league that has ever cancelled an entire season due to a labor dispute, and if they did it once they could do it again.
Something needs to be done to fix the negotiating process, because what they’ve been doing for nearly 2 decades clearly isn’t working. What we have here, it seems, is a failure to communicate. Isn’t there a mediator that could handle this? The problem appears to be that both sides are unwilling to compromise and are very slow to make concessions, maybe an outside party could force them to speed things up.
With so little consideration for the fans and their seeming eagerness to not play games, I think the NHL should change its logo to this:
After all, that’s what they’re best at.